Snort mailing list archives
sfportscan not writing to BASE
From: Richard Smollett <yawningdogge () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:59:14 -0500
After a portscan, my log file contains the following. Time: 02/11-14:49:22.006688 event_ref: 0 172.28.61.88 -> 172.28.61.39 (portscan) TCP Portscan Priority Count: 5 Connection Count: 5 IP Count: 1 Scanner IP Range: 172.28.61.88:172.28.61.88 Port/Proto Count: 5 Port/Proto Range: 23:993 So it looks like the preprocessor is working. But in the BASE interface, portscan traffic remains 0%. My rules are reporting to BASE just fine. Preprocessor config looks like this. preprocessor sfportscan: proto { all } scan_type { all } memcap { 10000000 } sense_level { low } logfile { /etc/snort/sfportscan.log }
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- sfportscan not writing to BASE Richard Smollett (Feb 11)