tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited
From: Guy Harris <guy () netapp com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:39:45 -0800
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:35:57PM -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
ps - i am reminded of something else i wanted at one point...i wanted to put *all* the dissector routines into libpcap,
I think that goes beyond what I'd consider libpcap's charter. Not all applications using libpcap would want to use tcpdump's dissectors. However:
enhance their interfaces somewhat so that more things could be passed in (flags, input buffer pointer and length, output buffer pointer and length, etc), so that i could say, in my code: hmm....here's a packet, would you please dissect it into a "human readable format" and place that representation in this buffer? tcpdump would call the dissectors and then just print the results. goofy idea?
that could go into a "libtcpdump" - and Michael Richardson has been working on such a library. - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:tcpdump-workers-request () tcpdump org?body=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: New APIs to support multiple DLT_'s on an interface, (continued)
- Re: New APIs to support multiple DLT_'s on an interface David Young (Dec 16)
- Re: New APIs to support multiple DLT_'s on an interface Guy Harris (Dec 16)
- -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 17)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 17)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 17)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 17)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Michael Richardson (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 19)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 19)