tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: alignment
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun () iijlab net>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 11:50:17 +0900
if not, is it acceptable if we test the feature in configure.in and use it if available?I'd say so (as long as this doesn't involve peppering the code with #ifdefs - if the feature *isn't* available, you still have to use the EXTRACT macros),
i was thinking about something like this: #if GCC #define __ATTRIBUTE_PACKED__ __attribute__((packed)) #else #define __ATTRIBUTE_PACKED__ #endif struct foo { u_int32_t bar; u_int32_t baz; } __ATTRIBUTE_PACKED__;
although note that "__attribute((packed))", at least according to the GCC 3.2 manual: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2/gcc/Variable-Attributes.html#Variable%20Attributes changes the layout of the structure, so you'd have to add padding to structures that lack it.
if they don't have padding, they do not work right even now. itojun - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:tcpdump-workers-request () tcpdump org?body=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- alignment itojun (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Nov 09)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 09)
- Re: alignment Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 10)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Nov 08)
- Re: alignment Guy Harris (Dec 11)