tcpdump mailing list archives
Packet capture performance comparison of quad-core Xeon vs Opteron
From: Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata () noaa gov>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:00:36 +0000
Greetings. I've read Fabian Schneider's thesis "Performance evaluation of packet capturing systems for high-speed networks", which compares capture performance under variable testing and generally finds that dual-core Opterons perform somewhat better under heavy capture load than dual-core Xeons. But now that quad-core Xeons are available, I'm curious whether anyone has measured capture improvement using four cores. I should expect four cores to do better, but I'd be interested in any empirical results to that effect. I'm wondering, for example, how close a box with a couple of dual-port PCIe Gb NICs (Endace or nPulse) and dual quad-core processors could come to 4Gb/s aggregate capture speed, while writing some packets to disk. Has anyone out there put together such a box and come up with some performance statistics? -- Jefferson Ogata <Jefferson.Ogata () noaa gov> NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT) <ncirt () noaa gov> "Never try to retrieve anything from a bear."--National Park Service - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Packet capture performance comparison of quad-core Xeon vs Opteron Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Jefferson Ogata (Jun 27)
- Re: Packet capture performance comparison of Stephen Donnelly (Jun 27)