tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 12:09:20 -0700
Charles Clancy wrote:
1. Allocate another DLT specifically for Radiotap+WiMAX 2. Extend the Radiotap header to indicate what protocol it's encapsulating 3. Don't use Radiotap, and develop something else What's the group's thoughts on these options, and which would be most preferred? #1 seems easiest, and #2 seems most logical.
I prefer #1 - it's easier, *and* it seems more logical to me; the most important thing about a capture would seem to me to be the link-layer type, not the fact that it has radio information.
- This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? Charles Clancy (May 03)
- Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? Guy Harris (May 03)
- Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? David Young (May 03)
- Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? Charles Clancy (May 03)
- Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? Guy Harris (May 04)
- Re: DLT for Radiotap+WiMAX? Charles Clancy (May 03)