tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop()
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:57:28 -0800
On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Selçuk Cevher wrote:
As far as I know, in general, pcap_loop() function of libpcap library is preferred over pcap_next_ex() function in both live and offline capture. Is it related to some kind of fact that pcap_loop() is more robust/reliable/efficient ?
It might be more efficient, but it's also older - at least some applications use it because pcap_next_ex() didn't *exist* when they were written (and pcap_next() is limited in its capabilities; that's why pcap_next_ex() was written).- This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop() Selçuk Cevher (Mar 05)
- Re: pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop() Guy Harris (Mar 05)
- Re: pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop() Gianluca Varenni (Mar 08)
- Re: pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop() Guy Harris (Mar 05)