tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog)
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:17:20 +0200
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:54:43PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
Are these structures likely to remain unchanged (other than new TLV types being added, and perhaps some TLVs changing length in a backwards-compatible fashion), so that older DLT_NFLOG captures won't be rendered unreadable by code that reads newer ones, or does this run the risk of changing into a mess like DLT_PFLOG, where the format changes in incompatible fashion, so that code that reads newer captures can't read older captures?-
In nfgenmsg there's version field, but I'm not in netfilter dev team, and can't answer these questions. If DLT_* registration process can be only done by someone who maintains given protocol/interface than I'm not such person :) Cheers, Jakub. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 20)
- Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Guy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 20)
- Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Guy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 20)
- Re: Request for a DLT value (for nflog) Guy Harris (Jun 20)