tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:43:56 -0700
On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:01 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail () yahoo com> wrote:
Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.". The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.". Is there any risks of regression ?
If we want to ensure that the configuration scripts we ship are generated by a particular version of autoconf, we should remove configure from the repository, add an autogen.sh script to re-generate the configure file, and ensure that it's run as part of the release-tarball building process. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 François-Xavier Le Bail (Apr 13)
- Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 Michael Richardson (Apr 13)
- Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 Guy Harris (Apr 13)
- Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 François-Xavier Le Bail (Apr 15)
- Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68 François-Xavier Le Bail (Apr 15)