tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: moves to github
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:57:11 -0700
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru> wrote:
I tried closing a couple of issues, but ran into a question. Do existing tags in GitHub issues (v3.5, v3.6, ... v4.3) mean "opened against version N.N" or "fixed in version N.N"?
Those were copied over from SourceForge; the intent, at least, of the tags was "opened against version N.N". I'm not sure whether they served/serve a useful purpose.
Should the tickets in SourceForge tracker be closed now?
If there were an automated way to do so - with commenting closed, and a "further comments on the issue at http://github.org/the-tcpdump-group/..." as the closing comment - that would make sense. I'm not sure anybody here wants to close 219 SourceForge comments by hand. :-) If you mean that when you close an issue by hand on GitHub, the corresponding SF issue should be closed by hand, that might not be a bad idea. (I did that for the tcpdump issue you closed on GitHub with "-W implements that".) _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- moves to github Michael Richardson (Apr 15)
- Re: moves to github Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: moves to github Denis Ovsienko (Apr 15)
- Re: moves to github Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Re: moves to github Denis Ovsienko (Apr 16)
- Re: moves to github Michael Richardson (Apr 16)
- Re: moves to github Denis Ovsienko (Apr 17)
- Re: moves to github Guy Harris (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: moves to github Michael Richardson (Apr 16)