tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: LINUX_SLL2
From: "Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <leonerd () leonerd org uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 19:25:10 +0000
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:20:40 +0000 Denis Ovsienko <denis () ovsienko info> wrote:
This makes SLL2 quite close to sockaddr_ll (except the the order of fields and the sll_family field, which is told to be equal to AF_PACKET in this case). In other words, it looks sufficiently good on paper to proceed with the implementation.
Ah; I wasn't intentionally making the order different to the underlying address struct. Does that matter? I'm happy to amend it if anyone thinks that's an issue, otherwise we'll just go with it. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd () leonerd org uk http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- LINUX_SLL2 Denis Ovsienko (Jan 12)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 - TEST REPLY Paul LeoNerd Evans (Jan 13)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 - TEST REPLY Denis Ovsienko (Jan 13)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 Paul "LeoNerd" Evans (Feb 15)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 Denis Ovsienko (Feb 25)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 Paul "LeoNerd" Evans (Mar 02)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 Paul "LeoNerd" Evans (Mar 23)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 Denis Ovsienko (Feb 25)
- Re: LINUX_SLL2 - TEST REPLY Paul LeoNerd Evans (Jan 13)