tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: [tcpdump] After setjmp/longjmp update
From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:36:49 +0100
--- Begin Message --- From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <devel.fx.lebail () orange fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:36:49 +0100
On 05/09/2020 18:20, Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers wrote:Hello, Some people ask for a new version of tcpdump. To understand why we cannot release now, here is some information: We are in the process to harden the tcpdump code with use of new (GET_) macros (with setjmp/longjmp logic) to fetch the packet data without have to do ND_TCHECK_/ND_TTEST_ macro calls before EXTRACT_ macros calls. [...]Hello, The post setjmp/longjmp updates take more time than expected. About 30% of the work is done. To avoid keeping too long the other updates in the master branch, we plan to release soon a 4.99.0 version. 5.0.0 will be the released later when all the "pre-longjmp" logic will be removed. In this transitional step the only visible effect should be that the -x/-X options will not always show the link-layer header in truncation cases. -- Francois-Xavier
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: [tcpdump] After setjmp/longjmp update Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [tcpdump] After setjmp/longjmp update Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Dec 18)
- Re: [tcpdump] After setjmp/longjmp update Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Dec 20)