tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch?
From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:50:55 +0100
--- Begin Message --- From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <devel.fx.lebail () orange fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:50:55 +0100
On 01/02/2021 18:08, Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers wrote:On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 22:29:21 -0800 Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote:I guess we meet those requirements, although I'm not too keen on having to keep going hat-in-hand to them every time we run out of credits; hopefully, we can just get a renewable amount.I had requested a renewable OSS allowance on 29 January, got the template response and confirmed the details. Let's see where it goes. The account is at 3790/10000 credits as of today, in other words, three more builds of libpcap or at most one tcpdump build, if/when the latter migrates.To save CI runtime, I have committed a063c2d21417345ee583551ef2c07a0be6b32696 for libpcap. This will currently run only five builders (amd64, arm64, ppc64le, s390x and osx) and do the matrix processing with scripts. We can build with ~ half the time (Total time ~26 mins). These scripts can be used locally for build tests, used on other CI and easily be updated to run new tests (32 bits builds, sanitizers, coverage, etc). Next step is doing similar setup for tcpdump...
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Jan 18)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Jan 20)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Dagobert Michelsen via tcpdump-workers (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Jan 21)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Jan 20)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Jan 28)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Michael Richardson via tcpdump-workers (Jan 28)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers (Feb 01)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Feb 03)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Michael Richardson via tcpdump-workers (Feb 03)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Feb 10)
- Re: Stick with Travis for continuous integration, or switch? Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers (Feb 03)