Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error]
From: fygrave () EPR0 ORG (CyberPsychotic)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 22:53:59 +0500
~:Well, I assert that mail with a year of 9999 or 0000 is "valid" by your ~:definition, and yet that's likely to cause trouble with at least a couple ~:of mail clients. Strict RFC compliance is a good place to start, but may ~:not be completely sufficient. ~: Speaking on the same note, anyone noticed that certain mailheaders (haven't figured out which ones, but once I hit this again, I probably won't be too lazy to examine) cause M$ outlook shipped with office 97 to crash with `Message is too big. Can not allocate memory'? I heard several people complained to me about such thing. Looks like it's got something to do with mime headers parsing..(personally don't mingle with M$ breeds, so I'd have to wait till another customer applies with such problem).
Current thread:
- [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Blue Boar (Nov 19)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Blue Boar (Nov 19)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Trevor Schroeder (Nov 20)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Blue Boar (Nov 20)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] CyberPsychotic (Nov 17)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Trevor Schroeder (Nov 20)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] John Duksta (Nov 20)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Alan Cox (Nov 21)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Trevor Schroeder (Nov 20)
- Re: [Fwd: Netscape mail client error] Blue Boar (Nov 19)