Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Capturing System Calls
From: jen () ETTNET SE (Joel Eriksson)
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:15:12 +0200
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 05:47:13PM -0400, Green Charles Contr AFRL/IFGB wrote:
None of the tools will allow me to capture and replace (or wrap) system calls without modifying the kernel or wrapping the application. A member of my team said it can be done, I'm simply trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. As everyone deserves.
Without modifying the kernel (including with kernelmodules)? Well, ok. Without wrapping the application in any way? _Obviously_ not. :-) The thing is that you did not mention the latter in your first mail, which is why a whole lot of people tried to help you out anyway... -- Joel Eriksson
Current thread:
- Re: Capturing System Calls, (continued)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Badger, Lee (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Whyte, Jesse (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Edsel Adap (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Green Charles Contr AFRL/IFGB (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Todd Garrison (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Jason Legate (Jun 23)
- Re: Capturing System Calls TeeSPy (Jun 23)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Job de Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Todd Garrison (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Marcy Abene (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Green Charles Contr AFRL/IFGB (Jun 22)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Joel Eriksson (Jun 23)
- Re: Capturing System Calls Darren Moffat - Solaris Sustaining Engineering (Jun 23)