Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K?
From: kish () TS CHECKPOINT COM (Kenneth Ish)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:51:49 -0600
Testing on a Win2k with VFAT produced the same response as NT: C:\>dir con\con Directory of \\. File Not Found I would assume this is probably because it is built (at least so the splash screens say) on the same technology as Windows NT. Windows NT on VFAT does also produce the same result. Kenneth Ish Check Point Software
Current thread:
- CGI directory path, (continued)
- CGI directory path NiGHTfly (Jul 07)
- Re: CGI directory path Vladimir Dubrovin (Mar 20)
- Re: CGI directory path mock () ACTIVESTATE COM (Mar 20)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient Marc (Mar 14)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient Drew (Mar 14)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient Edsel Adap (Mar 15)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient Bluefish (Mar 20)
- Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K? Bluefish (Mar 26)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K? Magus Ba'al (Mar 27)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K? vventura () SIA PT (Mar 27)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K? Kenneth Ish (Mar 27)
- Re: Crashing Win9x with smbclient - But NT & W2K? Stefan Fritsche (Mar 29)