Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Windows IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability
From: masial () SECURED ORG (Masial)
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 16:28:33 -0400
Does anyone have info about this particular issue? I would be interested in seeing what are those 'malformed' packets look like, and as usual, microsoft dosent give any technical details about the vunlerability. Trust us blindly! Nah. Any info appreciated. M. Secured Industries Why fear the unknown? 22E2 812A 50AA DC3B 107D 60E2 9998 959E 10E3 6031
Current thread:
- Re: Netscape forms using standard windows controls, (continued)
- Re: Netscape forms using standard windows controls Pavel Kankovsky (May 22)
- Re: Netscape forms using standard windows controls Chon-Chon Tang (May 22)
- Re: Why not a changeling? Bluefish (May 21)
- TopLayer layer 7 switch Advisory User nawk (May 20)
- Re: chsh Segfault on FreeBSD 3.3 Pavol Luptak (May 20)
- Re: possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? + bypassing IE settings Taneli Huuskonen (May 19)
- CAU Technologies, Inc. Security Advisory 2000.05.19.001 : Default Syslog Installations Security Advisory (May 19)
- UPDATE on possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? Zoa_Chien (May 19)
- Re: UPDATE on possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? Jim Paris (May 19)
- Re: UPDATE on possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? Jon Williams (May 20)
- Windows IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability Masial (May 20)
- Re: Windows IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability Mikael Olsson (May 21)
- Re: Outlook HTML VBS (demo) Michael Hendy (May 21)
- Re: Outlook HTML VBS (demo) Masial (May 22)
- Re: Windows IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability Blue Boar (May 21)
- Re: UPDATE on possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? Jim Paris (May 19)
- krb5 1.1.1 Mariusz Woloszyn (May 22)
- Re: Windows IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability Pete Philips (May 23)
- Re: UPDATE on possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? Bluefish (May 20)
- Re: possible new "e-mail virus" concept ? + bypassing IE settings Silvio L. Nisgoski (May 19)