Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh)
From: Adam Clarke <Adam.Clarke () STRATEGICDATA COM AU>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:44:43 +1000
This assumes that the development environment is static and known. You check for null termination this is a language/library specific requirement. In larger projects this is a poor assumption since you may decide to re-implement modules differently to achieve performance goals or meet other constraints. For example you may choose to implement the design in Java then during performance testing you notice that some java file operations are slowing down your code so you re-implement the file access module in C and use Java's native method call capability to wrap them up. I would call what you have below an implementation plan and as a result it would happen after the design phase and would be revisited if the target language changed. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan James" <Jonathan () SECURITO SE> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:40 PM
When designing software one has to take into account all the possible implementation problems that may exist. i.e 1. Read input from user 1.1 Check for null termination etc.. This is described in pseudo code, no coding needed.
My 2c Adam
Current thread:
- Re: CGI scripts in sh, (continued)
- Re: CGI scripts in sh -jf- (Sep 22)
- C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Sep 23)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Jonathan James (Sep 24)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Sep 25)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsin sh) Jonathan James (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsin sh) Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh) Jonathan James (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh) Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh) Jonathan James (Sep 28)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh) Reid Nichol (Sep 29)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsinsh) Adam Clarke (Sep 28)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scriptsin sh) Ben Galehouse (Sep 30)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Ben Galehouse (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Jonathan James (Sep 27)
- Re: C versus other languages,round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Crispin Cowan (Sep 28)
- Re: C versus other languages, round 538 or so (Re: CGI scripts in sh) Ryan Masters (Sep 24)
- Re: IP Spoofing with DHCP ? Matthew S. Hallacy (Sep 19)