Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Cons and Security Validation
From: Jose Nazario <jose () BIOCSERVER BIOC CWRU EDU>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:56:25 -0500
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote:
Anyone have a recomendation for a security-oriented convention where we could get some serious challenges to our security provisions?
if you're in the neighborhood of detroit, check out rubi-con (www.rubi-con.org), who expect to have a CTF network set up. i am not affiliated with rubi-con, mind you. ____________________________ jose nazario jose () cwru edu PGP: 89 B0 81 DA 5B FD 7E 00 99 C3 B2 CD 48 A0 07 80 PGP key ID 0xFD37F4E5 (pgp.mit.edu)
Current thread:
- Re: Cons and Security Validation, (continued)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Dan Kaminsky (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Matt Barringer (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation H D Moore (Feb 08)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 10)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Crispin Cowan (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Robert A. Seace (Feb 07)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Blue Boar (Feb 08)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Michel Kaempf (Feb 08)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Blue Boar (Feb 08)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Pavel Kankovsky (Feb 13)
- Re: Cons and Security Validation Robert A. Seace (Feb 07)