Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: [7.8.2002 44916] Notice of Copyright Infringement]


From: Chris <crux () moebius franken de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:41:50 +0200

* Rob Shein <shoten () starpower net> [020712 21:11]:
More to the point are the key copyright words, "without express written
permission."  I would feel very comfortable betting a month's salary
that being hired to look for copyrighted materials by the owner of that
copyright in this fashion is just that kind of permission.  :)

 hey, they are really proud of that.

        http://www.rangerinc.com

        Chris 


On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 04:27, Kayne Ian (Softlab) wrote:
2 points about this thread.

First, a lot of people have posted responses to the effect of "Unless xxx
downloads the file that is supposedly breaching copyright, they can't tell
if you *are* breaching copyright or not, thus breaching it themselves".
Unfortunately this isn't true (at least for EDonkey). EDonkey creates a hash
of the file on your hd, and compares it with the hashes on everyone elses
hd. If you're in the middle of downloading the file, Edonkey can be sure
it's resuming the same file from someone else (regardless of filename) by
these hashes. Therefore to prove copyright infringment, all these companies
need to do is to confirm your hashes are the same hashes as a "real" warezed
version of whatever movie. Of course the movie house give the company legal
permission to download etc the file, therefore they are not in contravention
of copyright law. So all the company does is run a donkeybot or similar,
scan the network and log all the people who are sharing a file with hashes
that match a warezed ver of the movie. Until it becomes illegal to own a
checksum of a file...

As a side note, this hashing works against them too. They may have been
flooding the p2p networks with "bad" versions of movies, but all any
sensible person needs to do is to use a website (sharereactor.com, for
example) and use the hash link off there. Providing the website is "true"
(and there are enough of them), you'll always be garanteed to download the
file you actually want.

Secondly, companies & "entities" in the USA really need to get a damn grip
of themselves. A friend of mine received an email from a company saying he
was breaching the DCMA etc for exactly the same reason as Keith Tyler. The
problem? He lives in the UK, just like me. Sorry to tell you, no matter how
much you don't want to believe it (and how many times you put a Skylarov in
jail) American law does NOT apply worldwide.

All that said, piracy is of course a crime. Views are my own. Standard
disclaimer applies etc etc.

Ian Kayne
Technical Specialist - IT Solutions
Softlab Ltd - A BMW Company







******************************************************************** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. 

If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for 
delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received 
this email in error and that any use of the information contained within 
this email or attachments is strictly prohibited. 

Internet communications are not secure and Softlab does not accept 
any legal responsibility for the content of this message. Any opinions 
expressed in the email are those of the individual and not necessarily 
those of the Company. 

If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with 
the content of this email please notify the IT helpdesk by telephone 
on +44 (0)121 788 5480. 

********************************************************************



-- 
__________________________________________________
public key fingerprint:
C18B 62D1 F68C A267 944D  EA9B 9CCA E658 72D8 FFF0


Current thread: