Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Ports 0-1023?
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () coredump cx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:06:56 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Martin Mačok wrote:
1) This is the Unix way and we want to be compatible (bind port, drop root - easy)
On a side note, for way too many programmers, this is not easy. There were way too many privilege dropping bugs, many of them caused by different semantics on different systems. -- _____________________________________________________ Michal Zalewski [lcamtuf () bos bindview com] [security] [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx] <=-=> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: =-=> Did you know that clones never use mirrors? <=-= http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/
Current thread:
- Re: Ports 0-1023?, (continued)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Thomas Cannon (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 05)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Brian Hatch (Jul 05)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Kevin Easton (Jul 06)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 06)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Bruno Morisson (Jul 07)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Brian Hatch (Jul 08)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Bruno Morisson (Jul 08)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Michal Zalewski (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Kent Crispin (Jul 04)
- RE: Ports 0-1023? Michal Zalewski (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 05)