Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Google lists vulnerable sites.
From: Octavio / Super <alvarezp () telnor net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 21:01:46 -0700
Google (or any other robot/search engine) might as well ignore robots.txt. I think not to trust these. Octavio. At 12:58 p.m. 06/07/2002 -0700, Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka wrote:
GOOGLE is an administration tool? hmm... anyway, you're right about the fact that yes it's not google's responsibility, admins could have a better robots.txt in their webfolders too. Anyway, not only google have been a tool for such searches, but i remember some folks using altavista and google both for order.log and infosearch.pl too.
Current thread:
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites., (continued)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Jose Nazario (Jul 06)
- RE: Google lists vulnerable sites. Bryan Allerdice (Jul 06)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Luis Bruno (Jul 07)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. KF (Jul 05)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Adam [wp-ckkl] (Jul 05)
- RE: Google lists vulnerable sites. Erick Arturo Perez Huemer (Jul 05)
- RE: Google lists vulnerable sites. Bryan Allerdice (Jul 05)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Kurt Seifried (Jul 05)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 06)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka (Jul 06)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Octavio / Super (Jul 06)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Ron DuFresne (Jul 07)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Alex DeLarge (Jul 08)
- Re: Google lists vulnerable sites. Skot (Jul 08)