WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: Authorization Framework.
From: "D. Höhn" <dmalloc () users sourceforge net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:48:41 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Babu Kopparam wrote: | | Hi! Experts, | Hello (though I am no expert). <snip> | I have proposed RBAC (referring NIST's specification) as the suitable | solution for Authorization. | As you might know RBAC stands for Role Based Access Control. There is a fundamental difference between Authorization and Authentication. What is it that you need to supply? I guess both of those topics need to be satisfied by your framework ? - -d -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFB9JpJPMoaMn4kKR4RA3UrAJ94RZi8p7aB2gttnNdY5uc1Yq/lNgCfeDGt X8T5KBq3m4c/PCK3pOuadVk= =Ja92 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Authorization Framework. Babu Kopparam (Jan 23)
- Re: Authorization Framework. D. Höhn (Jan 24)
- Re: Authorization Framework. Yuri Demchenko (Jan 24)