WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: SMS protection
From: Francois Yang <francois.y () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:07:37 -0500
I would not trust SMS by itself. I would suggest you choose an SMS authentication solution that allows you to add a pin or passcode along with the sms txt message. Something like what RSA offers. sorry I'm only familiar with RSA's solution, but I know other vendors offer similar functions. If you tied a Pin or passcode, it doesn't matter if an attacker or malicious person gets the sms txt because they would still need to know the PIN/passcode and the userID. Of course nothing's perfect, but it's better than just SMS by itself. To answer your question, I think it's secure enough, but then again think about how many banks don't use SMS, two factor auth or one time passwords. Frank On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Marcel Tudorache <marceltudorache () yahoo com> wrote:
Hi, I was wondering how secure is an SMS to be used as authentication/transaction signing means for an application similar with online banking. To make the analysis more targeted the following assumptions are made: - I understand that the new smartphones can get viruses, but I would like to analyse the simple case where we assume that the user does his due dilligence and either does not navigate on the internet or navigates on limited number of trusted websites, so the assumption is that the user does not have an trojan/malware/virus on the smartphone. -bluetooth is off - Wifi off... - the attacker does not have phisycal access to the mobile phone I think that the SIM card is pretty difficult to be hacked, from my smart card experience(limited), I would assume that before allowing the access to the network of a cloned SIM card the operator might validate some signature of the sim-card (I guess that when the operator issues SIM cards they sign them with their private key... or a similar process). The question is merely about the intrinsic security of receiving an SMS, and how easy would be for an attacker to read the SMS of somebody else taking into account the above assumptions. I think it should be pretty secure, what do you think? Thank you very much, Marcel This list is sponsored by Cenzic -------------------------------------- Let Us Hack You. Before Hackers Do! It's Finally Here - The Cenzic Website HealthCheck. FREE. Request Yours Now! http://www.cenzic.com/2009HClaunch_Securityfocus --------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by Cenzic -------------------------------------- Let Us Hack You. Before Hackers Do! It's Finally Here - The Cenzic Website HealthCheck. FREE. Request Yours Now! http://www.cenzic.com/2009HClaunch_Securityfocus --------------------------------------
Current thread:
- SMS protection Marcel Tudorache (Oct 24)
- RE: SMS protection Jesse Mundis (Oct 26)
- Re: SMS protection Fyodor (Oct 26)
- Re: SMS protection Marcel Tudorache (Oct 29)
- Re: SMS protection Francois Yang (Oct 26)
- Re: SMS protection Robin Wood (Oct 26)
- Message not available
- Re: SMS protection Marcel Tudorache (Oct 29)