Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: packets received by filter and captured
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:53:39 -0800
On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:10 AM, George Nychis wrote:
This is a tcpdump specific question, sorry that it is not directly a wireshark question. I could not find a user's mailing list for tcpdump. I was hoping that some overlap in the community would be able to help.
See my reply: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200911/msg00014.html to your previous mail asking this. If you're not subscribed to wireshark-users, you wouldn't have seen that reply, as replies to wireshark-users (and wireshark-dev) go, by default, only to the list. (The "xxxxxxxxxxxx" in "tcpdump-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxx" is "tcpdump.org", i.e. "tcpdump-workers () tcpdump org". The "xxxxxxxxxxxx" is there to foil email-address harvesters.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- packets received by filter and captured George Nychis (Nov 03)
- Re: packets received by filter and captured Guy Harris (Nov 03)