Wireshark mailing list archives
wireshark assertion issue
From: "Rach, Darshan" <DarshanR () nds com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:50:16 +0530
Hi, I have written a plugin to parse a new protocol called DASH in wireshark. For packets which are fragmented, I have the following piece of code: /* Multiple packets in response - last_packet_flag field is the last packet flag */ if(((block_number == 0) && (last_packet_flag == 0)) ||(block_number > 0)) { pkt->fragmented = TRUE; frag_msg = fragment_add_seq_check(tvb, packet_field_offset, pkt, msgid, /* ID for fragments belonging together */ msg_fragment_table, /* list of message fragments */ msg_reassembled_table, /* list of reassembled messages */ block_number, /* fragment sequence number */ tvb_length_remaining(tvb, packet_field_offset), /* fragment length - to the end */ last_packet_flag); /* More fragments? */ new_tvb = process_reassembled_data(tvb, packet_field_offset, pkt, "Reassembled OQTP Message", frag_msg, &msg_frag_items, NULL, oqtp_tree); /* Reassembled */ if (frag_msg) { col_append_str(pkt->cinfo, COL_INFO, "(Reassembled OQTP Response)"); } else { /* Not last packet of reassembled short message */ col_append_fstr(pkt->cinfo, COL_INFO, "(OQTP fragment %u)", block_number); } if (new_tvb) /* take it all */ { next_tvb = new_tvb; } else { /* make a new subset */ next_tvb = tvb_new_subset(tvb, packet_field_offset, -1, -1); } } Doing this way, I am getting a DISSECTOR BUG. [cid:image001.jpg@01CA6C3B.7C206AD0] Kindly help what might have gone wrong? Regards, Darshan ________________________________ This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster () nds com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. An NDS Group Limited company. www.nds.com
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wireshark assertion issue Rach, Darshan (Nov 23)
- Re: wireshark assertion issue Jaap Keuter (Nov 23)
- Re: wireshark assertion issue Guy Harris (Nov 23)