Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: UAT and Apply Callback
From: "Bryant Eastham" <beastham () pewla us pewg panasonic com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:19:53 -0600
Ping? Anybody have a solution to this issue? From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Bryant Eastham Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 12:10 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: [Wireshark-dev] UAT and Apply Callback All- Sorry to bother the list... Is it true that there is no way to have changes to UAT preferences cause the registered callback to occur? I have looked through the code, and it seems pretty clear that prefs_changed is not set by UAT, and that there are no external ways to set the flag. It also seems clear that the definition of module_t is not meant for external consumption (defined in an internal header). What am I missing? -Bryant Panasonic Electric Works Laboratory of America - SLC Lab 4525 So. Wasatch Blvd., Suite 100, 84124 Salt Lake City, UT 84124 T 801.993.7124 F 801.993.7260 beastham () pewla us pewg pansonic com Bryant Eastham Chief Architect
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- UAT and Apply Callback Bryant Eastham (Oct 09)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback Bryant Eastham (Oct 12)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback Jeff Morriss (Oct 12)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback Bryant Eastham (Oct 12)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback Jeff Morriss (Oct 12)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback (Partial Solution) Bryant Eastham (Oct 12)
- Re: UAT and Apply Callback Bryant Eastham (Oct 12)