Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch

[Alex Lindberg <alindber () yahoo com>]

90% of what I do is 100mb/sec.

DataCom also sells 1gig aggregation taps (both Tx and Rx are captured)

--- On Fri, 4/9/10, Ian Schorr <ian.schorr () gmail com> wrote:

From: Ian Schorr <ian.schorr () gmail com>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch
To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 4:20 AM

Do you guys really tend to work with 10/100 links these days?
-Ian

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Alex Lindberg <alindber () yahoo com> wrote:

In my work, I use a DataCom SS-100 tap (10/100mb).  Works great.


The use of Ethernet hubs is full of problems including Speed and Duplex issues and port mirroring on an Ethernet Switch 
does not always work as expected.

While true taps are more expensive that other solutions, if you do sniffing for a living, then they can't be beat.


DataCom: http://www.datacomsystems.com/index.asp

Alex Lindberg
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe