Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:05:50 -0800
On Dec 15, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Chris Maynard wrote:
Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:SHOULD in some RFC - or even a MUST - but I don't know offhand what RFC that is)http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
Sorry, I didn't make it clear that "what RFC that is" is "what RFC - if any - says that ephemeral ports should be handed out by default", not "what RFC explains what SHOULD and MUST mean". *Is* there an RFC that describes well-known, registered, and ephemeral ports? The first two of them are mentioned in the IANA port number assignment list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers but that doesn't mention ephemeral ports.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? eymanm (Dec 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Christopher Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Christopher Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Jeff Morriss (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Dirk Jagdmann (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 16)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Chris Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Dirk Jagdmann (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Jeff Morriss (Dec 16)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 16)