Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: wireshark capture shows packets not chronologically captured


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:10:54 -0800


On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Romel Khan wrote:

$ uname -a
Linux ... SMP ...

Wow, what a surprise:

        http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.3/0119.html

Is there no way to tell Linux to arrange that packets be delivered to a PF_PACKET socket in time stamp order?  If not, 
is there any way to, at least, provide some mechanism to allow libpcap to sort the packets in time stamp order before 
it delivers them?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: