Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking?

[Henry Ludemann <henry () protocollogic com>]

On 9 February 2010 23:46, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:
> Here's one that's not yet supported:
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200805/msg00058.html
> I've never had the time to work on it and likely never will at this
> point.

Sounds interesting... having tests available is useful
(https://fi.dev.java.net/source/browse/fi/RoundTripTests/).

Thanks!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe