Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark packets droppped
From: David <mizzou0 () yahoo com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:26:25 -0800
Thanks Jeff for the explanation. I think it's because the CPU load was saturated temporarily while tshark was running. Once I disabled all the running programs there are no more drop packets. On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:
David wrote:When I run tshark sometime I get "xxxx packets dropped" at the end of the session. Does this mean the wireshark is dropping the packets or the capture NIC is overrun or something else?It means the NIC received the packets but the capturing mechanism (libpcap + Wireshark) couldn't keep up. You might want to try capturing with 'dumpcap' instead to see if it can keep up with your traffic rate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: tshark packets droppped Jeff Morriss (Jan 07)
- Re: tshark packets droppped David (Jan 07)
- Re: tshark packets droppped Forthofer Russ (Jan 07)
- Re: tshark packets droppped Guy Harris (Jan 07)
- Re: tshark packets droppped Forthofer Russ (Jan 07)
- Re: tshark packets droppped Guy Harris (Jan 07)