Wireshark mailing list archives
packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1?
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:25:51 -0700
I've started working with Kerberos at work, and I was analyzing packets with Wireshark when I noticed that a number of the packet detail field names are pretty terse. Is packet-kerberos.c written by hand, generated with ASN.1 or both? I'm guessing both. Is there a move to change it to entirely one way or the other? I was wanting to expand some field names for things such as cusec. I realize that hf_krb_cusec has a description for the status line of "micro second component of client time" but I still think that cusec could be expanded in the details pane. Maybe something like "Client microseconds" or "Microseconds" under a Client tree title. Steve ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? Stephen Fisher (Jan 26)
- Re: packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? ronnie sahlberg (Jan 27)
- Re: packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? ronnie sahlberg (Jan 27)
- Re: packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? Anders Broman (Jan 27)
- Re: packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? ronnie sahlberg (Jan 27)
- Re: packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? ronnie sahlberg (Jan 27)