Re: Frame Numbers on Concatenated Frames

[Wes <wes_r () yahoo com>]

Yes, the frame number column is what I was referring to. A field corresponding to the un-disassembled (I think) frames 
would help.

Thanks Guy,

Wes

--- On Sat, 1/30/10, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

> From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Frame Numbers on Concatenated Frames
> To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2010, 2:32 PM
>
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Wes wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to set Wireshark to not count the
> broken out frames from a Docsis concatenated frame? Just to
> try to be more clear, I see a Concatenated Frame #1 which
> contains two concatenated packets. Then Wireshark shows
> those 2 packets with frame numbers #2 and #3. Hope this
> makes sense.
>
> If by "frame number" you mean the frame number column, that
> is intended to be the ordinal number of the lowest-level
> frames in the capture file.  We could probably add to
> the DOCSIS dissector a field corresponding to reassembled
> frame numbers, and you could use that as a custom column.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>          
>    mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


      
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe