Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Security issue being reported by the Secunia PSI scanner.


From: Richard Brooks <richardbuk () sky com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:36:50 -0000

True, but if all it takes to put it right is to include the later version,
then why not include the later version?

Regards
Richard
<RichardBUK () Sky com>
 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Bill Meier
Sent: 06 January 2010 22:47
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Security issue being reported by the Secunia
PSI scanner.

Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Richard Brooks wrote:

Hello Bill, in my last email I neglected to add the Secunia report  
information you asked for.

Your screenshots show that you're running Wireshark v1.2.5 with GTK+  
2.16.2.  I don't see anything that says "security" in the release  
notes (news) for GTK+ from v2.16.2 -> the latest 2.16, which is 2.16.6:

      http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/2.16/gtk+-2.16.6.news
      http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/2.16/gtk+-2.16.5.news
      http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/2.16/gtk+-2.16.4.news
      http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/2.16/gtk+-2.16.3.news

This is still something worth looking into.  I see that GTK+ 2.18.x is  
the current stable maintained branch, while 2.16.x is "old" but "but  
in some respects more stable" (http://www.gtk.org/download- 
windows.html).


Steve


Going one level deeper: It turns out the the Secunia Security ID which 
is being reported is SA37852: GTK+ "gdk_window_begin_implicit_paint()" 
Foreign Windows Weakness.

http://secunia.com/advisories/37852/

Among other things the advisory says "fixed in GTK 2.18.5".

The security level is reported as "not criotical"



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: