proto_item_append_text() using proto_tree

[David Aggeler <david_aggeler () hispeed ch>]

I was always wondering, why I would need to have *two* objects for an 
item containing a subtree. Doing debugging I realized, that its one and 
the same object.
and both types (proto_tree/proto_item) origin in proto_node. That makes 
much more sense.

Any objection to use proto_item_append_text() passing proto_tree? It 
would simply my dissector quite a bit.
And are there any objections to even go one step further, and call 
everything a node my dissector?

David

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe