Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: fragment_add_..(), pinfo->src/dst, IP vs. TCP Session


From: David Aggeler <david_aggeler () hispeed ch>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:16:09 +0200



http://blogs.technet.com/b/netmon/archive/2006/11/15/conversations-in-network-monitor-3-0-cable-talk.aspx
Looks logical

Meaning TCP connections, i.e. the command channel and data transfer 
channel are on separate TCP connections?
For one of the modes, yes.

That's what the fragment_add_seq routines are for ..
Only the 'port numbers' are ignored, i.e. they are not as hierarchical 
as they should be :-). E.g. it feels like IP-DICOM, The TCP level is 
somewhat ignored. I'd say the  reorder/retransmit is done correctly.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: