Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Output of 'tshark -T fields' with multiple occurrences of a field


From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:03:20 +0800

Sake,

Not saying that this isn't a good idea (being able to output repeated
fields), but I suspect when it gets to stable you might get some complaints.
If people use "-T fields" like they do a CSV file, they might be expecting a
fixed number of columns. (Currently whether there are 0, 1 or  more
instances, I think there are always the same number of commas).

You might want to think about adding this new feature only by adding a new
switch (say the -E aggregator switch)

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl> wrote:

Hi,

Recently a lot of questions have been asked on this list (and also at
Sharkfest) about the output of 'tshark -T fields -e <field>' when <field>
had multiple occurrences in one packet. Only the last occurrence was printed
by tshark. I submitted a fix that now prints all occurrences, aggregated by
commas (which can be overwritten with -E aggregator=<char>).

The fix will be included in version 1.6.x as well as in the next
development release (1.5.x). For the impatient, please use an automated
build from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ (look for a
version 33504 or higher).

Enjoy!
Cheers,


Sake

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: