Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type?

From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:44:50 -0700


On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:

After some more digging I found that the HTTP dissector does not
search for and call subdissectors if there are no unprocessed bytes
left in the packet. Does this mean that it's impossible to do any
custom processing of HTTP GET requests in a subdissector,


Yes.

What sort of custom processing are you trying to do?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
  - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Guy Harris (Jul 20)
    - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Stig Bjørlykke (Jul 19)
  - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
    - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)