Re: Secured way of using Wireshark

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames () darkjames ath cx>]

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:23:13PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> I guess you are unaware that many companies (such as the one I work for) have a policy in place on their mail servers 
> whereby the various notices, disclaimers, etc. are automatically appended to any outgoing mail.  My company has been 
> doing this at least as far back as 2004 (http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200407/msg00427.html).  At the 
> time, I even contacted our IT group to ask that the disclaimers be removed from outgoing e-mails, particularly when 
> they are being sent to open-source mailing lists such as this one.  But as you can tell by the annoying disclaimer 
> that will inevitably be appended to this e-mail, I was unsuccessful.  As stupid as they are, these disclaimers are 
> not likely to go away IMO.
 
Piece of advice from http://www.cygwin.com/ml/#disclaimer-bounce might help.

> If your company servers automatically add it, either persuade your
> sysadmins to turn it off for the lists, post from home, or use a free
> web-based e-mail service. There's enough of them out there.

-- 
Non-Proprietary (External Use Only - if swallowed, consult a doctor)
This email and any files transmitted with it are full of nonsense. 
If you read it, you owe me the contents of your wallet.
CAUTION: Contents may have settled in packing or shipping. Void basically everywhere. 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe