Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Regarding TCP Options


From: Karthik Balaguru <karthikbalaguru79 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:50:21 +0530

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhijit Bare <abhibare () gmail com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Karthik Balaguru
<karthikbalaguru79 () gmail com> wrote:

Hi,
I have been trying to analyze the TCP packet formats from realtime
traffic. But, while viewing the captured packets that are displayed in
the packet list pane by simply clicking on a packet in the packet list
pane, I am unable to find the TCP Options field(Variable 0 - 320 bits)
in the tree view pane. Is the feature of parsing of TCP options and
displaying in either tree view pane or other display panes absent in
wireshark ? Should i need to install some patch ? I cross-checked by
using the packETH (Linux GUI Packet Generator) to check the wireshark,
but it did not display the TCP Options field. Any ideas ? I am using
ethereal 0.99.0 version.

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

I just tried wireshark 1.2.2 (Windows) and ethereal 0.99.6 (Linux). I can
see TCP options in both.
Can you post a pcap file?


I have been continuing the process of analysis by using a latest
version of wireshark. I just now verified with Version 1.2.5 (SVN Rev
31296) on Windows OS, it seems to display the 'TCP options' field
properly. But, I wonder why the 0.99.0 version (linux) does not
display it.  Just as you have conveyed that it is displaying for
0.99.6(Linux) version, i too think that it should work for 0.99.0
version also. I will re-analyze the logs of version 1.2.5(Windows) and
0.99.0(Linux) and check the Connection establishment and TCP Call
flow.

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: