Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wireshark decode as..??
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames () darkjames ath cx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:50:55 +0100
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:09:19AM +1100, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
You also shouldnt hardcode the size of the array in the for loop like that, use something like sizeof[ports] / sizeof(ports[0]) instead.
Or better use wireshark array_length() macro. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- wireshark decode as..?? Brian Oleksa (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Guy Harris (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Brian Oleksa (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? wsgd (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Brian Oleksa (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Bill Meier (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? ronnie sahlberg (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Brian Oleksa (Mar 22)
- Re: wireshark decode as..?? Guy Harris (Mar 22)