Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Immediate ACK from server


From: vincent paul <amoteluro () yahoo com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:09:18 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Martin,
 
Thank you for your quick and precious explanation.  There are Riverbeds in our WAN.  
If possible could you please point me to papers/links about how Riverbed intercept packets between user and server (for 
example, does Riverbed inspect packet's payload to compress/de-compress, put back its original header, and forward the 
packet to its destination (or another Riverbed)
 
Once again, I greatly appreciate your help.
 
Regards,
PV

--- On Sat, 3/27/10, Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com> wrote:


From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Immediate ACK from server
To: "Community support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 11:29 PM



More than likely, assuming your measurements are correct,  there is a local "blackbox" between user and the server. 
This will possibly be an old-school application proxy (or a firewall acting as such a proxy), a device like Packeteer 
doing traffic-shaping, or a new-age WAN acceleration device (such as from Riverbed, or a Juniper WX or Cisco WAAS). 


These all can fake the ACK, and do so simply to either avoid the problems of delay on WAN traffic, either trying to 
serve cached traffic or manage the sliding Window to improve (or hinder) your throughput.
Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com



On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 1:22 PM, vincent paul <amoteluro () yahoo com> wrote:






Dear All,
 
I am looking at a trace between user and database server.  And I know for sure the RTT between them is 90 ms.
However, I observe that evertime user sends a request to server,  there is one immediate ACK from server to ack this 
packet (i.e. delta time between user's packet and its immediate ACK from the server is much less than RTT.  For example 
0.2 ms compared to RTT of 90 ms).
 
Please explain how such server's immediate ACK could happen.
 
regards,
PV

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


      
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: