Re: clang analysis

[Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>]

Kaul wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:57:51PM +0300, Kaul wrote:
> >
> > > I've ran clang static analyser on SVN latest and got the following:
> > > Obviously, there's little chance I can fix all of them. I can try fix
> > > a few from the dissectors I'm familiar with, though.

> Oy Vey! I've just built clang from SVN and now it finds 3354 bugs.
> Regretfully, its report is not file based - it just shows them one after
> another, not sorted by file.
> I'm not even sure how to open a bug on so many files, and it would be quite
> difficult go through each file and report the bug. The report ( 6 HTMLs,
> uncompressed) is 1.8MB - should I perhaps zip and file a single bug?
> I'm almost done with the fixes to packet-ssl.c, but there are so many
> others...
> Y.


I did a build using clang a while back and came to the conclusion that I 
would focus what appeared to be real problems (null-pointer deref, etc) 
as for me "life was too short" to try to fix all the dead code & etc.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe