Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: usbmon: size of different fields?
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:21:23 -0700
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:23:28 -0800 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Németh Márton wrote:OK, that's clear, the byte order of the API structure fields are in "host endian" order. The API structures are already saved by Wireshark into file for quite some time....and tcpdump. Support for capturing on USB on Linux has been in libpcap since at least libpcap 1.0.
I imagined that Nemeth wanted to implement an alternative to that. Surely he knows how libpcap works. In that case a new, host-independent format may be introduced. But userland is mysterious to me. I'll make sure to document ISO descriptors properly. I was sure I had done that, sorry. -- Pete ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- usbmon: size of different fields? Németh Márton (Nov 08)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Maynard, Chris (Nov 09)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Guy Harris (Nov 09)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Pete Zaitcev (Nov 11)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Németh Márton (Nov 09)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Guy Harris (Nov 09)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Pete Zaitcev (Nov 11)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Guy Harris (Nov 10)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Németh Márton (Nov 09)
- Re: usbmon: size of different fields? Maynard, Chris (Nov 09)