Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: editcap -B
From: Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:25:09 +0100
On 12 nov 2010, at 18:08, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 03:03:17PM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:I would expect '-A "2010-11-08 20:00:00" -B "2010-11-09 00:00:00"' to mean: All packets with a timestamp starting at "2010-11-08 20:00:00" and *before* "2010-11-09 00:00:00". Does anyone object to me changing (correcting) the current behavior of "-B" to what I would have expected?This matches what the help output (editcap -h) explains on the right side, although the term "stop time" is ambigious: -A <start time> don't output packets whose timestamp is before the given time (format as YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss). -B <stop time> don't output packets whose timestamp is after the given time (format as YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss). Thinking of it as letting Wireshark run while you're watching the time, when you see it reach the stop time, then you would stop the capture part way through that section, depending on your reaction time. So correcting it as you describe sounds fine to me, just make sure to update the help text.
"fixed" in SVN 34913 New editcap -h: -A <start time> only output packets whose timestamp is after (or equal to) the given time (format as YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss). -B <stop time> only output packets whose timestamp is before the given time (format as YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss). Cheers, Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- editcap -B Sake Blok (Nov 12)
- Re: editcap -B Stephen Fisher (Nov 12)
- Re: editcap -B Sake Blok (Nov 16)
- Re: editcap -B Stephen Fisher (Nov 12)