Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: protocol field declaration
From: Lange Jan-Erik <Jan-Erik.Lange () haw-hamburg de>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:58:09 +0100
It is discrete data. Perhaps this field must be broken up in future, too. But for now it would be good having it just as a hex value in a seperate field. ________________________________________ Von: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] im Auftrag von Stephen Fisher [steve () stephen-fisher com] Gesendet: Freitag, 19. November 2010 18:49 An: Developer support list for Wireshark Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] protocol field declaration On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:28:39PM +0100, Lange Jan-Erik wrote:
I want to have a field in my protocol, that is 18,25 Bytes long (18 Bytes and 2 Bits aditionally). Which type can I use therefore? When I use FT_BYTES I can't use bitmasking for getting the 2 Bits. And Using FT_INT64 is too short for 18 Bytes. How can I realize this field?
What type of data does the field have in it? It sounds like more than one value is in there. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- protocol field declaration Lange Jan-Erik (Nov 19)
- Re: protocol field declaration Stephen Fisher (Nov 19)
- Re: protocol field declaration Lange Jan-Erik (Nov 20)
- Re: protocol field declaration Stephen Fisher (Nov 19)