Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 34339: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 14:48:17 -0700


On Oct 3, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sake Blok wrote:

On 3 okt 2010, at 20:18, Guy Harris wrote:

        ...

Which .def file are you referring too?

The wpcap/PRJ/WPCAP.DEF and wpcap/PRJ/Wpcap_no_extensions.def files in the WinPcap source (replace slashes with 
backslashes if you're looking at the source on Windows).


Where is it failing?

It was failing in both "capture_filter_compile_cb" and "dumpcap.c", the only places where bpf_image is used. As long 
as HAVE_BPF_IMAGE is not defined, all is fine (except, the compile BPF button is not available and neither is dumpcap 
-d). But if I "add support for" bpf_image in the same way as I added support for pcap_open_dead, the linker complains 
that bpf_image can not be found.

That's because, at least in the current top of tree, the bpf_image() wrapper in capture-wpcap.c is static.  None of the 
other wrappers are.

libpcap 0.4 had neither pcap_open_dead() nor pcap_compile_nopcap() - you *had* to have a live capture device or a 
savefile open in order to compile a filter into BPF code.

So, that sounds to me like we should just use these functions without adding complexity by using 
"HAVE_PCAP_COMPILE_NOPCAP" until someone knocks at our door telling us that (s)he has a problem with these functions 
on their platform.

I'd say so.  It's been a long time since libpcap 0.5 came out - there might be some *really* old {Linux distributions, 
*BSD releases} still using 0.4, but if nobody complains if we require pcap_compile_nopcap() or pcap_open_dead(), it's 
probably not worth worrying about those old releases.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: