Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 36828: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:54:51 -0600
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:37:24PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
A bug on the inability to get clang to reject *as an error rather than as a warning* an unknown -f flag has been filed. (You can get it to reject unknown -W flags as errors with -Werror=unknown-warning-option.)
Thanks. That would make the AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK() to realize that it isn't an acceptable option wouldn't it? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 36828: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in Guy Harris (Apr 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 36828: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in Stephen Fisher (Apr 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 36828: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in Guy Harris (Apr 22)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 36828: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in Stephen Fisher (Apr 22)