Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX
From: Motonori Shindo <motonori () shin do>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:04:42 +0900
Anders, Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it. Sorry for the inconvenience. --- Motonori Shindo 2011/4/6 Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>:
Motonori Shindo skrev 2011-04-06 06:55: Hi, Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However, IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have different semantics so they should be distinguishable when they are displayed or specified in a filter. Please find attached the patch which does that. Regards, --- Motonori Shindo You should attach your patch to a bug report at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla It does not apply though: patching file epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c patch: **** missing line number at line 5: @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@ Regards Anders ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Jaap Keuter (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Anders Broman (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Guy Harris (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Guy Harris (Apr 05)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 06)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 06)
- Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX Motonori Shindo (Apr 05)