Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:47:47 +0200



On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC), Chris Maynard wrote: 


Jaap Keuter writes:

That's the common way to show the application
protocol in SIP message bodies. Most well known is Session Description
Protocol in Session Initiation Protocol messages: SIP/SDP.
But
dissect_ansi_637_trans_app() calls col_set_str(), not col_append_str(),
and I don't see a col_set_fence() in packet-sip.c, so I don't think we'd
see "SIP/IS-637-A" in the protocol column, but merely, "/IS-637-A". Is
that the intent? Or am I missing something and "SIP/IS-637-A" would be
displayed after all? [1]

Well, does anyone have a sample capture?


Thanks,
Jaap 

 

Links:
------
[1]
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: